Implant dentistry has spent decades building products, components and workflows around correcting the same underlying problem.
What if the interface itself was the problem?
Modern implant dentistry has produced increasingly sophisticated ways to correct, compensate, retrieve, service and maintain restorations.
What if many of those solutions exist because the interface itself was never fully addressed?
Over time, the industry developed different products, workflows and attachment philosophies to address the same underlying challenge.
The solutions became increasingly sophisticated, but the interface itself remained largely unchanged.
BMC is not another attachment method.
It is an attempt to simplify the relationship between the implant and the restoration.
Rather than creating separate philosophies for fixed, removable and overdenture solutions, the architecture is designed to support them within the same underlying framework.
That distinction sits at the centre of the opportunity.
The interface has received far less attention.
The architecture, validation work and strategic implications are available to parties interested in exploring the opportunity further.
Initiate DiscussionLead advisor responsible for the strategic process.
Karman Advisory.
Dental technician. 40 years in clinical prosthetics and lab work. Co-inventor.
BMC Dental.
Mechanical engineer. 40 years in precision manufacturing. Co-inventor.
BMC Dental.
