The ball abutment on the implant The BMC restoration seating down over the ball

For decades, the industry perfected the workaround.

Implant dentistry has spent decades building products, components and workflows around correcting the same underlying problem.

What if the interface itself was the problem?

0components to solve one problem
Scroll
The Question
If implant dentistry were invented today, would we design the interface this way?

Modern implant dentistry has produced increasingly sophisticated ways to correct, compensate, retrieve, service and maintain restorations.

What if many of those solutions exist because the interface itself was never fully addressed?

The Market
The industry standardized the workaround.

Implant prosthetics runs on a catalogue of hundreds of abutments. Almost all of it exists to correct one thing: implants are rarely placed parallel.

Every case becomes a kit, a different abutment for each angle, ground to fit and assembled by hand.

Dozens of different abutments and implant components across brands
The Constraint
Every implant sits at an angle. The interface has to absorb it.

Placement is rarely parallel. The geometry the restoration must resolve is fixed before the first component is chosen.

Abutments at 0, 17, 30 and 45 degrees, a different part for each angle

Today: a different abutment for every angle.

BMC
One interface, not a catalogue.
Two implants at 45 degrees each, a 90 degree envelope resolved at a single interface

BMC is not another attachment method. It sits between the implant and the restoration, one layer that resolves angulation across every implant brand below it.

Permanent and hybrid bridges and single-tooth implants, supported within the same architecture. Retrievable by the clinician, not by the patient. 45° + 45°, resolved at a single interface.

Workflow
One cut. One interface. From bench to bone.

Assembled at the bench, cemented into the tooth, then seated on the ball, straight or angled, the same interface holds.

Christian Lauridsen's assembly procedure: components assembled and cemented into the tooth, then ready, placed and fastened on the ball, with a red ball center-line running through the center of the ball at every stage and the final step showing an angled implant carrying an upright restoration

The ball is the interface. Assembled and cemented into the tooth by the technician, then installed straight on the ball by the dentist, regardless of the angle or direction of the implant, always with the same interface.

The red line is the ball center-line. It runs through the center of the ball at every stage. The tooth and superstructure seat down onto it, straight or angled, because one interface holds at any angle.

Strategic Implication
For decades, innovation has focused on implant systems, restorative components and clinical workflows.

The interface has received far less attention.

If that changes, who is best positioned to define the standard?
The Conversation

The architecture is documented. The process is live.

One interface, not a catalogue. A management meeting is the next step for a serious party.

Ask for a meeting
Where We Are
  1. International patent portfolio established.
  2. Freedom to operate reviewed by independent IP counsel.
  3. Ongoing M&A process.
Provenance

Bo Ekström

Dental technician · 40 years

Co-inventor of the BMC architecture.

BMC Dental

Christian Lauridsen

Mechanical engineer · 40 years

Co-inventor of the BMC architecture.

BMC Dental

Sami Sulieman

Owner and M&A transaction lead

Represents the sellers and leads the transaction.

Karman Advisory

The sellers will assist the buyer through the transition, and beyond if needed.

Ask for a meeting

Sami Sulieman

Karman Advisory

sami@karmaninvest.se

Engagement by introduction or direct contact.